Patient Presentation
A 9-year-old male came to clinic with a 2-day history of left scrotal discomfort. He had played in a soccer tournament the day it began and denied any trauma to the genital area. He initially thought it was due to chaffing of his undergarment during the tournament, but the discomfort had increased and was now mildly painful. It had awoken him up in the night, but he did not tell his parents until the morning of evaluation. He said there was no swelling or redness to the testicle and that he hadn’t noticed any changes in the pain with movement of the testicle. He denied any problems with the right testicle and scrotum. He denied any masses or swellings in the genital area and also denied any dysuria or discharge from his penis. He had had an upper respiratory infection the week before. He denied anyone inappropriately touching him or sexual contact.

The past medical history was negative for any genitourinary problems including no kidney problems or urinary tract infections. The family history was negative for genitourinary abnormalities. The review of systems was negative for fever, chills, nausea, emesis or diarrhea.

The pertinent physical exam showed a male with normal vital signs including a temperature of 98.8F and normal growth parameters at the 75-90%. He was Tanner I for pubic hair and testicular size. His testicles were symmetrically located in the scrotum when observed without obvious erythema or masses to the scrotum. The phallus was circumcised and normal. The left testicle showed mild pain with palpation of the epididymis and possibly the testicle itself, but it was more prominent over the epididymis. There were no obvious masses of the testicle or along the cord. There was no change in pain with testicular elevation. No inguinal hernias were palpated.

The diagnosis of acute epididymitis with possible orchitis was made. The laboratory evaluation included a urinalysis that was normal and the urine culture was pending. The pediatrician discussed the patient with the on-call urologist who was comfortable with treating him with supportive care and monitoring without further evaluation or empiric antibiotics. The patient’s clinical course showed that he had similar pain for another 48 hours and then this declined until he was pain free by 6 days after the onset. He never was febrile nor had any urinary symptoms, and it was felt this was possibly due to a post-viral infection.

Discussion
In acute epididymitis there is usually an insidious onset of a painful epididymis with swelling and inflammation. Often the testicle itself is also involved and this condition is called epididymo-orchitis. The term epididymitis will be used here. Epididymitis is a common cause of acute scrotal pain with about 1/3 of prepubescent boys presenting with this problem. Some studies show a bimodal distribution of infancy and prepuberty, while others show a peak in prepuberty or late adolescence. With epididymitis, there is normal placement of the testes and normal cremasteric reflex. Scrotal edema may occur and there may also be dysuria. The exact mechanism is not known but may be because of “…urinary outflow obstruction which leads to reflux of urine into the ejaculatory duct.” The actual cause if often not identified (< 10% is cited) but is likely viral infections, post-infection inflammation or trauma in younger boys, but in adolescents and adults sexually transmitted infections are more common. Common pathogens in younger males are adenovirus, enterovirus and Mycoplasma. In adolescents, Neisseria gonorrhea and Chlamydia trachomatis may occur. E. coli is also common if there are associated anatomic abnormalities. As some studies have found that epididymal aspirates correlate with urine culture, urine culture is used as a marker for bacterial analysis.

Learning Point
As some studies have found that epididymal aspirates correlate with urine culture, urine culture is used as a marker for bacterial analysis. Assessment includes evaluation of other causes of scrotal swelling or testicular pain (see Questions for Further Discussion below) and usually a urine culture, and testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the appropriate age range. Testing for both gonorrhea and chlamydia is recommended as concomitant STIs may occur together. Treatment for younger, prepubescent males is mainly supportive including ice, rest and anti-inflammatory medication. Antibiotics are often not recommended in this age group unless there is a higher risk of a serious bacterial infection such as an anatomic abnormality, neonatal age, or being immunocompromised. For adolescents and young adults, empiric treatment with antibiotics against common infections, and definitive treatment for positive urine culture or STI testing is recommended. Although in general there are good outcomes for epididymitis occurring in the pediatric age range, testicular abscess or infarction can occur.

Questions for Further Discussion
1. What causes scrotal swelling? A review can be found here
2. What causes testicular pain? A review can be found here
3. What is a spermatocele?

Related Cases

Disease: Epididymitis | Testicular Disorders

Symptom/Presentation: Scrotal Pain

Specialty: Nephrology / Urology

Age: School Ager

To Learn More
To view pediatric review articles on this topic from the past year check PubMed.

Evidence-based medicine information on this topic can be found at SearchingPediatrics.com and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Information prescriptions for patients can be found at MedlinePlus for this topic: Testicular Disorders

To view current news articles on this topic check Google News.

To view images related to this topic check Google Images.

To view videos related to this topic check YouTube Videos.

Cristoforo TA. Evaluating the Necessity of Antibiotics in the Treatment of Acute Epididymitis in Pediatric Patients: A Literature Review of Retrospective Studies and Data Analysis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(12):e1675-e1680. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001018

Norton SM, Saies A, Browne E, et al. Outcome of acute epididymo-orchitis: risk factors for testicular loss. World J Urol. 2023;41(9):2421-2428. doi:10.1007/s00345-023-04500-1

Hoffmann K, Gopal M. Paediatric acute epididymo-orchitis temporally related to SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case series and review of the literature. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2024;20(1):91-94. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.09.017

Author
Donna M. D’Alessandro, MD
Professor of Pediatrics, University of Iowa

Patient Presentation

Some general pediatricians were discussing the new recommendations from the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for the use of leucovorin to treat cerebral folate deficiency. “I’ve had a couple of families who just wanted more information and wanted to know if their child might benefit. I had another family who just wanted me to give them leucovorin,” said one. “I had one family who wanted me to order antibody testing. The testing from what I have read isn’t FDA approved,” another replied. “I think what we all want is the best for the kids and families. Maybe this is going to be the beginning of some additional treatment options for some families, but from what I’ve read probably not for most families. The answer is always “more research is needed,””the third commented.

Discussion

Leucovorin is also known as folinic acid, calcium folinate, or 5-formyl tetrahydrofolic acid. Folinic acid exists in nature whereas folic acid is a synthetic, water-soluble form of Vitamin B9 or folate. Folic acid needs to be converted to folinic acid to be biologically active. Folate is often added to foods to fortify them. A review of what foods have folic acid in them can be found here.

There is growing recognition of the possibilities that targeted metabolic therapies could play in the management of patients with specific subsets of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The FDA approved leucovorin for cerebral folate deficiency in September 2025. The FDA news release and Federal Register state approval is for “cerebral folate deficiency” but it appears that approval may be for patients with FOLR1 gene variants. [Additional information was not available from the FDA at the time of this writing]. FOLR1-related cerebral folate transport deficiency is among “…several causes of folate deficiency restricted to the central nervous system characterized by very low levels of cerebrospinal (CSF) folate in the absence of clinically significant systemic folate deficiency.” GeneReviews® notes that as of 1/11/24, 35 individuals from 21 families have been reported with FOLR1-related cerebral folate transport deficiency. Other causes of CNS folate deficiency include disorders of transport in the choroid plexus due to mitochondrial dysfunction, several hereditary disorders of folate metabolism and FOLR1 autoantibodies.

There have been some studies of patients with ASD who tested positive for anti-folate receptor antibodies who were treated with leucovorin and who showed some improvements. One example is a randomized-controlled, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial published in 2024 which included 80 participants who were followed for 24 weeks. Other examples include an open-label trial of 44 children with ASD with followup for 4 months, and another double-blind placebo controlled trial with 48 children followed for 3 months. Note that these are studies with small numbers of patients, followed for only a relatively short period of time. Also prevalence in the general population of these antibodies is estimated at 7-15%, so the antibodies are not a specific indication of ASD. Current testing for antibodies is not FDA approved or cleared. This means that testing including “…clinical interpretation standards, validation, and analytic performance are established by the performing laboratory rather than by an FDA-reviewed labeling process.” For proprietary reasons, some or all of the testing procedures and result interpretation criteria are not available for review.

Learning Point

Leucovorin’s FDA-approved indications for use are for treating:

• Chemotherapy side-effect modulator such as methotrexate
• Megaloblastic anemia
• Cerebral folate deficiency

Leucovorin is not FDA approved for all patients with ASD.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) notes that there are limits to the current research on leucovorin use in patients with ASD including that there are few patients in the studies, there are concerns about some of the study methods, most of the studies are from the same group of researchers and the studies need reproducibility from other research groups to verify the results, large safety and efficacy trials have not been completed, and “[a] conclusion of all of the published studies is that more research is needed, and the AAP concurs.”

The AAP at the time of this writing states that “…the current evidence base remains too limited to support specific clinical recommendations” for use of leucovorin in patients with ASD.

The search for ASD causes and definitive treatment needs to continue with peer-reviewed research to answer these questions, and concurrently ensuring that patients and families are receiving the services and supports they need to live healthy lives as valued community members.

The President of the Society of Inherited Metabolic Disorders stated in a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services, “…[W]e want to reiterate a foundational principle: the presence of autism in any child is not the parents’ fault. As we continue to expand our understanding of the biological underpinnings of autism, compassion must guide our messaging, to avoid pointing blame and creating guilt.”

Questions for Further Discussion

1. What are some indications for genetic testing for individuals with neurodevelopmental delays? A review can be found here
2. What are some causes of intellectual disability? A review can be found here
3. What are indications for referral to speech therapy? A review can be found here
   
   

Related Cases

Disease: Leucovorin | Folic Acid | Autism | Genetic Disorders | Child Behavior Disorders

Symptom/Presentation: Behavior Problems | Developmental Delay

Specialty: Developmental Disabilities | Genetics | Neurology / Neurosurgery | Nutrition / Dietetics

Age: None

To Learn More

To view pediatric review articles on this topic from the past year check PubMed.

Evidence-based medicine information on this topic can be found at SearchingPediatrics.com and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Information prescriptions for patients can be found at MedlinePlus for these topics: Autism and Leucovorin.

To view current news articles on this topic check Google News.

To view images related to this topic check Google Images.

To view videos related to this topic check YouTube Videos.

Frye RE, Rossignol DA, Scahill L, McDougle CJ, Huberman H, Quadros EV. Treatment of Folate Metabolism Abnormalities in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2020;35:100835. doi:10.1016/j.spen.2020.100835

Panda PK, Sharawat IK, Saha S, Gupta D, Palayullakandi A, Meena K. Efficacy of oral folinic acid supplementation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2024;183(11):4827-4835. doi:10.1007/s00431-024-05762-6

Goldman ID. FOLR1-Related Cerebral Folate Transport Deficiency. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, eds. GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle; 1993. Posted 1/11/24. Accessed October 28, 2025. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK599286/

Gristan YD, Patel P, Moosavi L. Folinic Acid. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Accessed October 27, 2025. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545232/

FDA News Release. FDA Takes Action to Make a Treatment Available for Autism Symptoms. FDA. September 22, 2025. Accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-action-make-treatment-available-autism-symptoms

Approval of Previously Withdrawn New Drug Application for WELLCOVORIN (Leucovorin Calcium) Tablets. Federal Register. September 24, 2025. Accessed October 28, 2025. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/24/2025-18510/approval-of-previously-withdrawn-new-drug-application-for-wellcovorin-leucovorin-calcium-tablets

OMIM®Folate Receptor, Alpha;FOLR1, Entry 136430.https://www.omim.org/entry/136430?search=136430&highlight=136430, Accessed 10/28/25

OMIM® Neurodegeneration due to Cerebral Folate Transport Deficiency; NCFTD. Entry 613068. https://www.omim.org/entry/613068?search=613068&highlight=613068. Accessed 10/28/25

Reigier DS. President of the Society for Inherited Metabolic Disorders. Letter to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., dated October 1, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Pediatricians and other Prescribing Pediatric Clinicians: Leucovorin Use in Autism and Cerebral Folate Deficiency. Accessed November 3, 2025. https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/autism/use-of-leucovorin-in-autistic-pediatric-patients/frequently-asked-questions-faqs-for-pediatricians-and-other-prescribing-pediatric-clinicians/

Interim Guidance from the American Academy of Pediatrics: Use of Leucovorin in Autistic Pediatric Patients. Accessed November 3, 2025. https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/autism/use-of-leucovorin-in-autistic-pediatric-patients/

Author

Donna M. D’Alessandro, MD

Professor of Pediatrics, University of Iowa

Patient Presentation
A 4.5-year-old male came to clinic for his well child examination and medication followup. His mother reported that he was overall doing well in preschool this year with his teachers “not sending home too many notes,” this year. He had a history of being a difficult child even from infancy with large emotional outbursts, difficulty sleeping, ignoring adults and being a risk-taker. These behaviors had not improved with parent-child interaction therapy and consistent caregiver interventions. Ten months previously he was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by a psychiatrist and was started on guanfacine. Since then, his most challenging behaviors had improved as had his sleeping. “He gets along with most of the kids, most of the time,” his mother reported. “He can be a bit much and even his sister has to get away from him sometimes. The teachers at school say it is the same there. He isn’t malicious or mean, he just isn’t great at reading other people’s emotions and is a little, let’s say too enthusiastic at times. I love that about him but Dad and I need a break sometimes too,” she explained.

The pertinent physical exam showed a smiling male asking lots of questions. His growth parameters were 50%. His physical examination was unremarkable.

The diagnosis of a healthy male with ADHD treated effectively was made. The mother stated that she felt she knew how to handle him and didn’t think he would benefit by restarting behavioral therapy at this time. She would continue to see the psychiatrist as well.

Discussion
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common problem with potentially 2.5% of children affected. Preschool children normally have less regulation than older children. Those with ADHD can have exaggerated behaviors which can cause additional problems including difficult caregiver-child interactions, impaired peer interactions, problems with learning and potential for expulsion from childcare/school facilities.

The differential diagnosis for ADHD is very broad and an inattention problem may not be ADHD. A review can be found here. For young children, normal variations in behavior are common. Parent and other caregiver expectations, and tolerance for those behaviors can be mismatched. Also parental skills for managing challenging behaviors may need to be learned or supported.

Guanfacine is an imidazole derivate acting as a selective central α 2-adrenergic receptor agonist. It theoretically acts by modulating the pre-frontal cortex and therefore improves attention and decreases impulsivity and irritability. It has short-acting and long-acting variations. Overdose can potentially cause central nervous system depression with bradycardia and hypotension; extended-release medications have long half-lives and therefore the side-effects can persist for days.

Learning Point
Once a young child has been diagnosed with ADHD then the first treatment option is behavioral interventions and support, along with monitoring. For children where this treatment is not enough, then stimulant medication usually with methylphenidate is the next step. If the child has concurrent symptoms of oppositional behavior or severe irritability, then an alpha adrenergic is the first line medication treatment instead. If the child is unresponsive to stimulants or cannot tolerate the side effects then an α adrenergic medication such as guanfacine is recommended.

In the first study reporting medication response and treatment side-effects for ADHD for preschool children seen in behavioral-developmental clinics, 497 children with a mean age of 62 months and 82% males were studied. Medications prescribed were methylphenidate (57.5% – mainly short-acting), amphetamines (7.2%), guanfacine (31.6% mainly short-acting) and clonidine (3.6%). In their study, preschool children had improvement with both drug classes. For “associated with improvement” stimulants were 78% while α adrenergic medication were 66%, and for “very much improved”, stimulants were 38% and α adrenergic medications were 25%. The side effect profiles were also different. Patients using stimulants reported moodiness/irritability (50%), appetite suppression (38%), disrupted behavior (22%) and sleep difficulties (21%), and stomachaches 13%, and repetitive behaviors (11%). Patients using α adrenergic medication reported daytime sleepiness (38%), moodiness/irritability (29%), disruptive behavior (28%), and sleep difficulties (11%). Children prescribed α adrenergic medications were more likely to continue to use the medications longer than those using stimulants.

Guanfacine is also used as an additional medication to help control ADHD symptoms in some older children and adolescents who are not controlled with stimulants alone.

Questions for Further Discussion
1. What medications do you use for young children with ADHD? Why?
2. What are indications for referral to a psychiatrist or psychologist?
3. How is the diagnosis of ADHD made in young children?

Related Cases

Disease: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity | Child Behavior Disorders

Symptom/Presentation: Attention Deficit Disorder/ Overactivity

Specialty: Developmental Disabilities | General Pediatrics

Age: Preschooler

To Learn More
To view pediatric review articles on this topic from the past year check PubMed.

Evidence-based medicine information on this topic can be found at SearchingPediatrics.com and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Information prescriptions for patients can be found at MedlinePlus for these topics: Guanfacine and ADHD.

To view current news articles on this topic check Google News.

To view images related to this topic check Google Images.

To view videos related to this topic check YouTube Videos.

Childress A, Hoo-Cardiel A, Lang P. Evaluation of the current data on guanfacine extended release for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2020;21(4):417-426. doi:10.1080/14656566.2019.1706480

Froehlich TE. Comparison of Medication Treatments for Preschool Children With ADHD: A First Step Toward Addressing a Critical Gap. JAMA. 2021;325(20):2049. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.5603

Harstad E, Shults J, Barbaresi W, et al. α 2 -Adrenergic Agonists or Stimulants for Preschool-Age Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. JAMA. 2021;325(20):2067. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.6118

Peters E, Hodgson SE, Elliott R, Greene SL. Guanfacine exposure in paediatric and adolescent patients: A multicentre retrospective review. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2025;37(2):e70018. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.70018

Author
Donna M. D’Alessandro, MD
Professor of Pediatrics, University of Iowa

Patient Presentation
A 4-year-old female came to the emergency room with a history of increased seizures for the past several days. She was a former premature infant with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy who had known intermittent seizures that were usually treated with levetiracetam. She had been more tired, cranky and had had 3 seizures in 3 days. She did not need rescue medication, and had had her usual post-ictal somnolence for about 1-2 hours each time. Her parents thought she was worsening overall and brought her to the emergency room. She had fallen during a playground game 5 days previously and hit her head on the cement. She was not able to participate in school for the rest of the day but did go to school for the rest of the week. Her medications had not recently changed and her parents were adamant that she had received her regular dosing on schedule and had not seen any evidence of medication poisoning.

The review of systems was negative for fever, diarrhea, rashes and upper respiratory symptoms. She did complain that her head hurt and the lights in the emergency room hurt her eyes and these were new symptoms per the parents.

The pertinent physical exam her heart rate was 62 beats/minute, blood pressure was 115/60, respiratory rate of 24. Her Glascow coma scale was 15 but she appeared very tired. She would become cranky easily during the examination, especially the eye examination which could not be completed. Her overall examination was normal and there were no specific focal findings on neurological examination.

The work-up included the usual laboratory evaluation and urine for toxicology. The radiologic evaluation of computed tomography revealed a brainstem mass. Magnetic resonance imaging was most consistent with glioma. The patient’s clinical course showed that stereotactic biopsy was planned for further evaluation of the mass. The diagnosis of pediatric-type diffuse high-grade glioma was eventually made and radiation was started. Chemotherapy was also being considered.

Figure 150 – Sagittal T1 MRI without contrast of the brain (above left) shows a large mass expanding the entire brainstem. Axial T2 (above right) and axial FLAIR (below left) MRI show the mass to be somewhat heterogenous and the mass has multiple foci of enhancement on the axial T1 MRI with contrast (below right).

Discussion
Brain tumors, even those with favorable prognoses, have the potential for causing morbidity and mortality within a short-time because of their obvious space-occupying capacity within the closed space of the skull. Secondary brain tumors, those due to metastases from distant location cancers, are the most common brain tumors.

Risk factors for gliomas include age and exposure to ionizing radiation. “Cellular phone use is not associated with increased risk of gliomas.” Hereditary risk factors for gliomas are well known for some genetic mutations. Family history is positive for 5% of glioma patients without a known tumor predisposition syndrome such as the following:

• Neurofibromatosis type 1 – especially pilocytic astrocytoma (Grade 1)
• Neurofibromatosis type 2 – especially spinal ependymoma
• Tuberous sclerosis complex – subependymal giant cell astrocytoma
• Li-Fraumeni syndrome – several cancers including IDH-wild-type- high-grade astrocytic gliomas or IDH-mutant astrocytomas
• Lynch syndrome – IDH-mutant astrocytomas

Presentation usually is due to evaluation for focal neurological deficits, seizures, and increasing/non-resolving symptoms such as headache. They can also be an incidental finding such as neuroimaging after head trauma, or may be found due to screening for patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. Magnetic resonance imaging or Positron emission tomography (PET) scans are usually the imaging of choice. Treatment is primary surgical if the tumor is amenable. Radiation and chemotherapy can be options in some cases. Management of other problems such as cerebral edema by use of dexamethasone, anti-epileptics, and multi-disciplinary management with physical therapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy, social work and psychology can also be important for overall functioning. Quality of life can be dramatically altered even with a “treatable” glioma. Patients have increased risk of mental health issues such as depression and anxiety, fatigue, and continued seizures. Survivors can also have neurocognitive impairment (including cognition, attention, processing speed, and working memory), psychosocial problems and overall lower socioeconomic status.

Learning Point
Of primary brain tumors in adults and children, 30% are caused by gliomas and 80% of malignant brain tumors are caused by gliomas. Overall central nervous system (CNS) tumors have an incidence of 24.83/100,000 population, occurring in females more than males and also more in non-Hispanic populations. The highest incidence is Europe.

Overall the most common brain tumors for adults and children are:

• Meningiomas – 40.8%
• Pituitary tumors – 17.2%
• Glioblastoma – 14.2%
• Nerve sheath tumors – 8.3%
• Diffuse and anaplastic astrocytoma – 3.1%
• Ependymal tumors – 1.5%
• Olidgodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytic tumors 1.3%

The World Health Organization (WHO) 5 major grouping of gliomas are:

• Pediatric-type diffuse low-grade glioma – most common pediatric brain tumor, accounting for 30% of all pediatric brain tumors
• Pediatric-type diffuse high-grade glioma
• Adult-type diffuse glioma – 90% of gliomas overall in adults and children
• Circumscribed astrocytic glioma
• Ependymal tumors

Adult-type gliomas can be found in the pediatric age group and pediatric-type gliomas can be found in the adult age group, especially in the “cross-over” years of young adulthood.

Grading of gliomas

• Grade 1
  • Slow-growing, well-demarcated, usually amenable to surgery, favorable prognosis
  • Example: pilocytic astrocytoma
• Grade 2
  • Slow-growing, have invasive growth so not amenable to complete resection
  • Example: diffuse astrocytoma and oligodendrogliomas
• Grade 3
  • Rapidly growing, aggressive growth
  • Example: anaplastic astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas
• Grade 4
  • Rapidly growing, highly aggressive, poor prognosis
  • Example: glioblastoma, IDH wild type, pediatric-type high grade

Overall prognosis depends on the group, grade, specific molecular subtypes and location.

Questions for Further Discussion
1. What are the components of Cushing’s triad?
2. What is the scoring system for the Glascow Coma Scale? A review can be found here
3. What is in the differential diagnosis for first time seizures?

Related Cases

Disease: Glioma | Childhood Brain Tumors

Symptom/Presentation: Fatigue | Seizures

Specialty: Neurology / Neurosurgery | Oncology | Radiology / Nuclear Medicine / Radiation Oncology

Age: Preschooler

To Learn More
To view pediatric review articles on this topic from the past year check PubMed.

Evidence-based medicine information on this topic can be found at SearchingPediatrics.com and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Information prescriptions for patients can be found at MedlinePlus for this topic: Childhood Brain Tumors

To view current news articles on this topic check Google News.

To view images related to this topic check Google Images.

To view videos related to this topic check YouTube Videos.

Sait SF, Giantini-Larsen AM, Tringale KR, Souweidane MM, Karajannis MA. Treatment of pediatric low-grade gliomas. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023;23(4):185-199. doi:10.1007/s11910-023-01257-3

Wu J, Heidelberg RE, Gajjar A. Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(6):686-695. doi:10.1200/JCO.23.01747

Fangusaro J, Jones DT, Packer RJ, et al. Pediatric low-grade glioma: State-of-the-art and ongoing challenges. Neuro Oncol. 2023;26(1):25-37. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad195

Weller M, Wen PY, Chang SM, et al. Glioma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024;10(1):33. doi:10.1038/s41572-024-00516-y

Author
Donna M. D’Alessandro, MD
Professor of Pediatrics, University of Iowa